Correlation Between AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in AKITA Drilling with a short position of Magna Mining. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining.

Diversification Opportunities for AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining

AKITAMagnaDiversified AwayAKITAMagnaDiversified Away100%
0.24
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between AKITA and Magna is 0.24. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Magna Mining and AKITA Drilling is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on AKITA Drilling are associated (or correlated) with Magna Mining. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Magna Mining has no effect on the direction of AKITA Drilling i.e., AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon AKITA Drilling is expected to under-perform the Magna Mining. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, AKITA Drilling is 1.44 times less risky than Magna Mining. The stock trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Magna Mining is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  139.00  in Magna Mining on December 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  11.00  from holding Magna Mining or generate 7.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

AKITA Drilling  vs.  Magna Mining

 Performance 
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15Dec2025Feb -15-10-50510
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15AKT-A NICU
       Timeline  
AKITA Drilling 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days AKITA Drilling has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, AKITA Drilling is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15JanFebMarFebMar1.41.451.51.551.61.651.71.75
Magna Mining 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Magna Mining are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal fundamental indicators, Magna Mining may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15JanFebMarFebMar1.41.51.61.71.8

AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15-3.98-2.98-1.98-0.98-0.01670.931.922.93.884.87 0.030.040.050.06
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15AKT-A NICU
       Returns  

Pair Trading with AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining

The main advantage of trading using opposite AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if AKITA Drilling position performs unexpectedly, Magna Mining can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Magna Mining will offset losses from the drop in Magna Mining's long position.
The idea behind AKITA Drilling and Magna Mining pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated