Correlation Between AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between AKA Brands Holding and Jeffs Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in AKA Brands with a short position of Jeffs Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between AKA and Jeffs is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding AKA Brands Holding and Jeffs Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jeffs Brands and AKA Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on AKA Brands Holding are associated (or correlated) with Jeffs Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jeffs Brands has no effect on the direction of AKA Brands i.e., AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands

Considering the 90-day investment horizon AKA Brands Holding is expected to generate 0.99 times more return on investment than Jeffs Brands. However, AKA Brands Holding is 1.01 times less risky than Jeffs Brands. It trades about -0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Jeffs Brands is currently generating about -0.34 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,682  in AKA Brands Holding on December 10, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (441.00) from holding AKA Brands Holding or give up 26.22% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

AKA Brands Holding  vs.  Jeffs Brands

 Performance 
       Timeline  
AKA Brands Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days AKA Brands Holding has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward-looking signals remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.
Jeffs Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Jeffs Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental drivers remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite AKA Brands and Jeffs Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if AKA Brands position performs unexpectedly, Jeffs Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jeffs Brands will offset losses from the drop in Jeffs Brands' long position.
The idea behind AKA Brands Holding and Jeffs Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device