Correlation Between Montana Technologies and Armstrong World

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Montana Technologies and Armstrong World at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Montana Technologies and Armstrong World into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Montana Technologies and Armstrong World Industries, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Montana Technologies and Armstrong World and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Montana Technologies with a short position of Armstrong World. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Montana Technologies and Armstrong World.

Diversification Opportunities for Montana Technologies and Armstrong World

0.42

Correlation Coefficient

Montana Technologies  Armstrong World

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Montana and Armstrong is 0.42. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Montana Technologies and Armstrong World Industries in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Armstrong World Indu and Montana Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Montana Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Armstrong World. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Armstrong World Indu has no effect on the direction of Montana Technologies i.e., Montana Technologies and Armstrong World go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Montana Technologies and Armstrong World

Assuming the 90 days horizon Montana Technologies is expected to generate 7.51 times more return on investment than Armstrong World. However, Montana Technologies is 7.51 times more volatile than Armstrong World Industries. It trades about 0.43 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Armstrong World Industries is currently generating about -0.25 per unit of risk. If you would invest  65.00  in Montana Technologies on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  84.00  from holding Montana Technologies or generate 129.23% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	95.45%
Values	Daily Returns

Montana Technologies  vs.  Armstrong World Industries

Montana Technologies

Risk-Adjusted Performance

24 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Montana Technologies are ranked lower than 24 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking indicators, Montana Technologies showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Armstrong World Indu

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Armstrong World Industries are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak basic indicators, Armstrong World may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Montana Technologies and Armstrong World

The main advantage of trading using opposite Montana Technologies and Armstrong World positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Montana Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Armstrong World can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Armstrong World will offset losses from the drop in Armstrong World's long position.

The idea behind Montana Technologies and Armstrong World Industries pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.