Correlation Between Alpine Global and Cohen Steers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Alpine Global and Cohen Steers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Alpine Global and Cohen Steers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Alpine Global Infrastructure and Cohen Steers Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Alpine Global and Cohen Steers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Alpine Global with a short position of Cohen Steers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Alpine Global and Cohen Steers.

Diversification Opportunities for Alpine Global and Cohen Steers

0.57
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Alpine and Cohen is 0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Alpine Global Infrastructure and Cohen Steers Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cohen Steers Global and Alpine Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Alpine Global Infrastructure are associated (or correlated) with Cohen Steers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cohen Steers Global has no effect on the direction of Alpine Global i.e., Alpine Global and Cohen Steers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Alpine Global and Cohen Steers

Assuming the 90 days horizon Alpine Global Infrastructure is expected to generate 0.78 times more return on investment than Cohen Steers. However, Alpine Global Infrastructure is 1.29 times less risky than Cohen Steers. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cohen Steers Global is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,453  in Alpine Global Infrastructure on September 11, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (40.00) from holding Alpine Global Infrastructure or give up 1.63% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Alpine Global Infrastructure  vs.  Cohen Steers Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Alpine Global Infras 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Alpine Global Infrastructure has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Alpine Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Cohen Steers Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cohen Steers Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Alpine Global and Cohen Steers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Alpine Global and Cohen Steers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Alpine Global and Cohen Steers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Alpine Global position performs unexpectedly, Cohen Steers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cohen Steers will offset losses from the drop in Cohen Steers' long position.
The idea behind Alpine Global Infrastructure and Cohen Steers Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets