Correlation Between Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ashford Hospitality Trust and Hudson Pacific Properties, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ashford Hospitality with a short position of Hudson Pacific. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific.

Diversification Opportunities for Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific

-0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ashford and Hudson is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ashford Hospitality Trust and Hudson Pacific Properties in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hudson Pacific Properties and Ashford Hospitality is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ashford Hospitality Trust are associated (or correlated) with Hudson Pacific. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hudson Pacific Properties has no effect on the direction of Ashford Hospitality i.e., Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Ashford Hospitality Trust is expected to under-perform the Hudson Pacific. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Ashford Hospitality Trust is 1.49 times less risky than Hudson Pacific. The stock trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Hudson Pacific Properties is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  305.00  in Hudson Pacific Properties on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (12.00) from holding Hudson Pacific Properties or give up 3.93% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ashford Hospitality Trust  vs.  Hudson Pacific Properties

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ashford Hospitality Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ashford Hospitality Trust are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unfluctuating technical indicators, Ashford Hospitality may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Hudson Pacific Properties 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hudson Pacific Properties has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ashford Hospitality and Hudson Pacific positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ashford Hospitality position performs unexpectedly, Hudson Pacific can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hudson Pacific will offset losses from the drop in Hudson Pacific's long position.
The idea behind Ashford Hospitality Trust and Hudson Pacific Properties pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk