Correlation Between AM EAGLE and China Communications
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both AM EAGLE and China Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining AM EAGLE and China Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between AM EAGLE OUTFITTERS and China Communications Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on AM EAGLE and China Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in AM EAGLE with a short position of China Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of AM EAGLE and China Communications.
Diversification Opportunities for AM EAGLE and China Communications
-0.3 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between AFG and China is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding AM EAGLE OUTFITTERS and China Communications Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Communications and AM EAGLE is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on AM EAGLE OUTFITTERS are associated (or correlated) with China Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Communications has no effect on the direction of AM EAGLE i.e., AM EAGLE and China Communications go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between AM EAGLE and China Communications
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon AM EAGLE is expected to generate 6.76 times less return on investment than China Communications. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, AM EAGLE OUTFITTERS is 2.29 times less risky than China Communications. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Communications Services is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 9.03 in China Communications Services on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 43.97 from holding China Communications Services or generate 486.93% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
AM EAGLE OUTFITTERS vs. China Communications Services
Performance |
Timeline |
AM EAGLE OUTFITTERS |
China Communications |
AM EAGLE and China Communications Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with AM EAGLE and China Communications
The main advantage of trading using opposite AM EAGLE and China Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if AM EAGLE position performs unexpectedly, China Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Communications will offset losses from the drop in China Communications' long position.The idea behind AM EAGLE OUTFITTERS and China Communications Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.China Communications vs. Nippon Telegraph and | China Communications vs. Superior Plus Corp | China Communications vs. NMI Holdings | China Communications vs. SIVERS SEMICONDUCTORS AB |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |