Correlation Between Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Alaska Energy Metals and JPMorgan Chase Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Alaska Energy with a short position of JPMorgan Chase. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase.

Diversification Opportunities for Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase

-0.34

Correlation Coefficient

Alaska Energy  JPMorgan Chase

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Alaska and JPMorgan is -0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Alaska Energy Metals and JPMorgan Chase Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on JPMorgan Chase and Alaska Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Alaska Energy Metals are associated (or correlated) with JPMorgan Chase. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of JPMorgan Chase has no effect on the direction of Alaska Energy i.e., Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Alaska Energy Metals is expected to under-perform the JPMorgan Chase. In addition to that, Alaska Energy is 2.17 times more volatile than JPMorgan Chase Co. It trades about -0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. JPMorgan Chase Co is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,808  in JPMorgan Chase Co on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  380.00  from holding JPMorgan Chase Co or generate 13.53% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Alaska Energy Metals  vs.  JPMorgan Chase Co

Alaska Energy Metals

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Alaska Energy Metals has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.

JPMorgan Chase

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in JPMorgan Chase Co are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, JPMorgan Chase displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase

The main advantage of trading using opposite Alaska Energy and JPMorgan Chase positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Alaska Energy position performs unexpectedly, JPMorgan Chase can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in JPMorgan Chase will offset losses from the drop in JPMorgan Chase's long position.

The idea behind Alaska Energy Metals and JPMorgan Chase Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.