Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Physical and iShares Bloomberg Roll, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of IShares Bloomberg. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg

0.91
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and IShares is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Physical and iShares Bloomberg Roll in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on iShares Bloomberg Roll and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Physical are associated (or correlated) with IShares Bloomberg. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of iShares Bloomberg Roll has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Goldman Sachs Physical is expected to generate 1.25 times more return on investment than IShares Bloomberg. However, Goldman Sachs is 1.25 times more volatile than iShares Bloomberg Roll. It trades about 0.34 of its potential returns per unit of risk. iShares Bloomberg Roll is currently generating about 0.21 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,577  in Goldman Sachs Physical on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  468.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Physical or generate 18.16% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Physical  vs.  iShares Bloomberg Roll

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Physical 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Physical are ranked lower than 27 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively conflicting basic indicators, Goldman Sachs unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
iShares Bloomberg Roll 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in iShares Bloomberg Roll are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly unsteady fundamental indicators, IShares Bloomberg may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and IShares Bloomberg positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, IShares Bloomberg can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in IShares Bloomberg will offset losses from the drop in IShares Bloomberg's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Physical and iShares Bloomberg Roll pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments