Correlation Between SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between SCIENCE IN SPORT and Scientific Games, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SCIENCE IN with a short position of Scientific Games. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games.

Diversification Opportunities for SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games

0.71

Correlation Coefficient

SCIENCE IN  Scientific Games

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between SCIENCE and Scientific is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SCIENCE IN SPORT and Scientific Games in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Scientific Games and SCIENCE IN is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SCIENCE IN SPORT are associated (or correlated) with Scientific Games. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Scientific Games has no effect on the direction of SCIENCE IN i.e., SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games

Assuming the 90 days horizon SCIENCE IN SPORT is expected to under-perform the Scientific Games. In addition to that, SCIENCE IN is 1.22 times more volatile than Scientific Games. It trades about -0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Scientific Games is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  8,100  in Scientific Games on December 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,400  from holding Scientific Games or generate 17.28% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

SCIENCE IN SPORT  vs.  Scientific Games

SCIENCE IN SPORT

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days SCIENCE IN SPORT has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, SCIENCE IN is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Scientific Games reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games

The main advantage of trading using opposite SCIENCE IN and Scientific Games positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SCIENCE IN position performs unexpectedly, Scientific Games can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will offset losses from the drop in Scientific Games' long position.

The idea behind SCIENCE IN SPORT and Scientific Games pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.