Correlation Between Max Zipper and China Construction

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Max Zipper and China Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Max Zipper and China Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Max Zipper Co and China Construction Bank, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Max Zipper and China Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Max Zipper with a short position of China Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Max Zipper and China Construction.

Diversification Opportunities for Max Zipper and China Construction

-0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Max and China is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Max Zipper Co and China Construction Bank in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Construction Bank and Max Zipper is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Max Zipper Co are associated (or correlated) with China Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Construction Bank has no effect on the direction of Max Zipper i.e., Max Zipper and China Construction go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Max Zipper and China Construction

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Max Zipper Co is expected to generate 3.87 times more return on investment than China Construction. However, Max Zipper is 3.87 times more volatile than China Construction Bank. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Construction Bank is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  9,150  in Max Zipper Co on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  310.00  from holding Max Zipper Co or generate 3.39% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Max Zipper Co  vs.  China Construction Bank

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Max Zipper 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Max Zipper Co are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal basic indicators, Max Zipper may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
China Construction Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Construction Bank has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, China Construction is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Max Zipper and China Construction Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Max Zipper and China Construction

The main advantage of trading using opposite Max Zipper and China Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Max Zipper position performs unexpectedly, China Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Construction will offset losses from the drop in China Construction's long position.
The idea behind Max Zipper Co and China Construction Bank pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.