Correlation Between China Times and Simple Mart

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Times and Simple Mart at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Times and Simple Mart into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Times Publishing and Simple Mart Retail, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Times and Simple Mart and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Times with a short position of Simple Mart. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Times and Simple Mart.

Diversification Opportunities for China Times and Simple Mart

-0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Simple is -0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Times Publishing and Simple Mart Retail in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Simple Mart Retail and China Times is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Times Publishing are associated (or correlated) with Simple Mart. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Simple Mart Retail has no effect on the direction of China Times i.e., China Times and Simple Mart go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Times and Simple Mart

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon China Times Publishing is expected to generate 4.35 times more return on investment than Simple Mart. However, China Times is 4.35 times more volatile than Simple Mart Retail. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Simple Mart Retail is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,865  in China Times Publishing on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  60.00  from holding China Times Publishing or generate 3.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

China Times Publishing  vs.  Simple Mart Retail

 Performance 
       Timeline  
China Times Publishing 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Times Publishing are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, China Times may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Simple Mart Retail 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Simple Mart Retail has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, Simple Mart is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.

China Times and Simple Mart Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with China Times and Simple Mart

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Times and Simple Mart positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Times position performs unexpectedly, Simple Mart can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Simple Mart will offset losses from the drop in Simple Mart's long position.
The idea behind China Times Publishing and Simple Mart Retail pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance