Correlation Between Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lamar Advertising with a short position of CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE.
Diversification Opportunities for Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE
0.19 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Lamar and CPU is 0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE and Lamar Advertising is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lamar Advertising are associated (or correlated) with CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE has no effect on the direction of Lamar Advertising i.e., Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Lamar Advertising is expected to under-perform the CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Lamar Advertising is 3.89 times less risky than CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE. The stock trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 89.00 in CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 11.00 from holding CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE or generate 12.36% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Lamar Advertising vs. CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE
Performance |
Timeline |
Lamar Advertising |
CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE |
Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE
The main advantage of trading using opposite Lamar Advertising and CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lamar Advertising position performs unexpectedly, CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE will offset losses from the drop in CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE's long position.Lamar Advertising vs. Apple Inc | Lamar Advertising vs. Apple Inc | Lamar Advertising vs. Apple Inc | Lamar Advertising vs. Apple Inc |
CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE vs. United Utilities Group | CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE vs. Lamar Advertising | CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE vs. Grand Canyon Education | CPU SOFTWAREHOUSE vs. IDP EDUCATION LTD |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements |