Correlation Between Baker Hughes and China Oilfield

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Baker Hughes and China Oilfield at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Baker Hughes and China Oilfield into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Baker Hughes Co and China Oilfield Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Baker Hughes and China Oilfield and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Baker Hughes with a short position of China Oilfield. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Baker Hughes and China Oilfield.

Diversification Opportunities for Baker Hughes and China Oilfield

-0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Baker and China is -0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Baker Hughes Co and China Oilfield Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Oilfield Services and Baker Hughes is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Baker Hughes Co are associated (or correlated) with China Oilfield. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Oilfield Services has no effect on the direction of Baker Hughes i.e., Baker Hughes and China Oilfield go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Baker Hughes and China Oilfield

Assuming the 90 days horizon Baker Hughes Co is expected to generate 0.61 times more return on investment than China Oilfield. However, Baker Hughes Co is 1.64 times less risky than China Oilfield. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Oilfield Services is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,847  in Baker Hughes Co on October 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,379  from holding Baker Hughes Co or generate 48.44% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Baker Hughes Co  vs.  China Oilfield Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Baker Hughes 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Baker Hughes Co are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Baker Hughes reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
China Oilfield Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Oilfield Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, China Oilfield is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Baker Hughes and China Oilfield Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Baker Hughes and China Oilfield

The main advantage of trading using opposite Baker Hughes and China Oilfield positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Baker Hughes position performs unexpectedly, China Oilfield can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Oilfield will offset losses from the drop in China Oilfield's long position.
The idea behind Baker Hughes Co and China Oilfield Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.