Correlation Between Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cambricon Technologies Corp and Tieling Newcity Investment, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cambricon Technologies with a short position of Tieling Newcity. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity.

Diversification Opportunities for Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity

0.93
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cambricon and Tieling is 0.93. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cambricon Technologies Corp and Tieling Newcity Investment in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Tieling Newcity Inve and Cambricon Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cambricon Technologies Corp are associated (or correlated) with Tieling Newcity. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Tieling Newcity Inve has no effect on the direction of Cambricon Technologies i.e., Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Cambricon Technologies Corp is expected to generate 2.82 times more return on investment than Tieling Newcity. However, Cambricon Technologies is 2.82 times more volatile than Tieling Newcity Investment. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Tieling Newcity Investment is currently generating about 0.24 per unit of risk. If you would invest  21,518  in Cambricon Technologies Corp on September 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  33,742  from holding Cambricon Technologies Corp or generate 156.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy98.28%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cambricon Technologies Corp  vs.  Tieling Newcity Investment

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cambricon Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

23 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cambricon Technologies Corp are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Cambricon Technologies sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Tieling Newcity Inve 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Tieling Newcity Investment are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Tieling Newcity sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cambricon Technologies and Tieling Newcity positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cambricon Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Tieling Newcity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Tieling Newcity will offset losses from the drop in Tieling Newcity's long position.
The idea behind Cambricon Technologies Corp and Tieling Newcity Investment pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm