Correlation Between Ibase Gaming and Green World

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ibase Gaming and Green World at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ibase Gaming and Green World into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ibase Gaming and Green World Fintech, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ibase Gaming and Green World and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ibase Gaming with a short position of Green World. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ibase Gaming and Green World.

Diversification Opportunities for Ibase Gaming and Green World

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Ibase and Green is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ibase Gaming and Green World Fintech in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Green World Fintech and Ibase Gaming is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ibase Gaming are associated (or correlated) with Green World. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Green World Fintech has no effect on the direction of Ibase Gaming i.e., Ibase Gaming and Green World go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ibase Gaming and Green World

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ibase Gaming is expected to under-perform the Green World. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Ibase Gaming is 2.13 times less risky than Green World. The stock trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Green World Fintech is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4,265  in Green World Fintech on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,845  from holding Green World Fintech or generate 43.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ibase Gaming  vs.  Green World Fintech

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ibase Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ibase Gaming has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.
Green World Fintech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Green World Fintech are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal basic indicators, Green World showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Ibase Gaming and Green World Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ibase Gaming and Green World

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ibase Gaming and Green World positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ibase Gaming position performs unexpectedly, Green World can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Green World will offset losses from the drop in Green World's long position.
The idea behind Ibase Gaming and Green World Fintech pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges