Correlation Between Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Thinkingdom Media Group and Zhejiang Construction Investment, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Thinkingdom Media with a short position of Zhejiang Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction.

Diversification Opportunities for Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction

0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Thinkingdom and Zhejiang is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Thinkingdom Media Group and Zhejiang Construction Investme in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zhejiang Construction and Thinkingdom Media is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Thinkingdom Media Group are associated (or correlated) with Zhejiang Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zhejiang Construction has no effect on the direction of Thinkingdom Media i.e., Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Thinkingdom Media Group is expected to generate 0.89 times more return on investment than Zhejiang Construction. However, Thinkingdom Media Group is 1.13 times less risky than Zhejiang Construction. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zhejiang Construction Investment is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,797  in Thinkingdom Media Group on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  210.00  from holding Thinkingdom Media Group or generate 11.69% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Thinkingdom Media Group  vs.  Zhejiang Construction Investme

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Thinkingdom Media 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Thinkingdom Media Group are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Thinkingdom Media sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Zhejiang Construction 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zhejiang Construction Investment are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Zhejiang Construction sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction

The main advantage of trading using opposite Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Thinkingdom Media position performs unexpectedly, Zhejiang Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zhejiang Construction will offset losses from the drop in Zhejiang Construction's long position.
The idea behind Thinkingdom Media Group and Zhejiang Construction Investment pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges