Correlation Between Bank of China and Jason Furniture

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of China and Jason Furniture at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of China and Jason Furniture into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of China and Jason Furniture, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of China and Jason Furniture and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of China with a short position of Jason Furniture. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of China and Jason Furniture.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of China and Jason Furniture

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Jason is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of China and Jason Furniture in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jason Furniture and Bank of China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of China are associated (or correlated) with Jason Furniture. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jason Furniture has no effect on the direction of Bank of China i.e., Bank of China and Jason Furniture go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of China and Jason Furniture

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of China is expected to generate 0.5 times more return on investment than Jason Furniture. However, Bank of China is 1.99 times less risky than Jason Furniture. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Jason Furniture is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  402.00  in Bank of China on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  126.00  from holding Bank of China or generate 31.34% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of China  vs.  Jason Furniture

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of China are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Bank of China sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Jason Furniture 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Jason Furniture are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Jason Furniture sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of China and Jason Furniture Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of China and Jason Furniture

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of China and Jason Furniture positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of China position performs unexpectedly, Jason Furniture can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jason Furniture will offset losses from the drop in Jason Furniture's long position.
The idea behind Bank of China and Jason Furniture pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories