Correlation Between Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of China with a short position of Thinkingdom Media. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media

0.59

Correlation Coefficient

Bank of China  Thinkingdom Media

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Thinkingdom is 0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Thinkingdom Media and Bank of China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of China are associated (or correlated) with Thinkingdom Media. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Thinkingdom Media has no effect on the direction of Bank of China i.e., Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of China is expected to generate 3.36 times less return on investment than Thinkingdom Media. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of China is 3.01 times less risky than Thinkingdom Media. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Thinkingdom Media Group is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,891  in Thinkingdom Media Group on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  96.00  from holding Thinkingdom Media Group or generate 5.08% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Bank of China  vs.  Thinkingdom Media Group

Bank of China

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of China are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Bank of China may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Thinkingdom Media

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Thinkingdom Media Group are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Thinkingdom Media sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of China position performs unexpectedly, Thinkingdom Media can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Thinkingdom Media will offset losses from the drop in Thinkingdom Media's long position.

The idea behind Bank of China and Thinkingdom Media Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.