Correlation Between China Publishing and Bank of Communications

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Publishing and Bank of Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Publishing and Bank of Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Publishing Media and Bank of Communications, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Publishing and Bank of Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Publishing with a short position of Bank of Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Publishing and Bank of Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for China Publishing and Bank of Communications

-0.06

Correlation Coefficient

China Publishing  Bank of Communications

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Bank is -0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Publishing Media and Bank of Communications in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of Communications and China Publishing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Publishing Media are associated (or correlated) with Bank of Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of Communications has no effect on the direction of China Publishing i.e., China Publishing and Bank of Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Publishing and Bank of Communications

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon China Publishing Media is expected to generate 2.74 times more return on investment than Bank of Communications. However, China Publishing is 2.74 times more volatile than Bank of Communications. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of Communications is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  694.00  in China Publishing Media on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (19.00) from holding China Publishing Media or give up 2.74% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

China Publishing Media  vs.  Bank of Communications

China Publishing Media

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days China Publishing Media has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, China Publishing is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Bank of Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Bank of Communications has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Bank of Communications is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with China Publishing and Bank of Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Publishing and Bank of Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Publishing position performs unexpectedly, Bank of Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of Communications will offset losses from the drop in Bank of Communications' long position.

The idea behind China Publishing Media and Bank of Communications pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.