Correlation Between China Construction and Eoptolink Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Construction and Eoptolink Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Construction and Eoptolink Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Construction Bank and Eoptolink Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Construction and Eoptolink Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Construction with a short position of Eoptolink Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Construction and Eoptolink Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for China Construction and Eoptolink Technology

-0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Eoptolink is -0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Construction Bank and Eoptolink Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Eoptolink Technology and China Construction is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Construction Bank are associated (or correlated) with Eoptolink Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Eoptolink Technology has no effect on the direction of China Construction i.e., China Construction and Eoptolink Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Construction and Eoptolink Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon China Construction is expected to generate 4.38 times less return on investment than Eoptolink Technology. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, China Construction Bank is 3.81 times less risky than Eoptolink Technology. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Eoptolink Technology is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,833  in Eoptolink Technology on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,641  from holding Eoptolink Technology or generate 525.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

China Construction Bank  vs.  Eoptolink Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
China Construction Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Construction Bank are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, China Construction is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Eoptolink Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Eoptolink Technology has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

China Construction and Eoptolink Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with China Construction and Eoptolink Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Construction and Eoptolink Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Construction position performs unexpectedly, Eoptolink Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Eoptolink Technology will offset losses from the drop in Eoptolink Technology's long position.
The idea behind China Construction Bank and Eoptolink Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals