Correlation Between Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Zhejiang Publishing Media and Thinkingdom Media Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Zhejiang Publishing with a short position of Thinkingdom Media. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media.

Diversification Opportunities for Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media

0.05
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Zhejiang and Thinkingdom is 0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Zhejiang Publishing Media and Thinkingdom Media Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Thinkingdom Media and Zhejiang Publishing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Zhejiang Publishing Media are associated (or correlated) with Thinkingdom Media. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Thinkingdom Media has no effect on the direction of Zhejiang Publishing i.e., Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Zhejiang Publishing Media is expected to under-perform the Thinkingdom Media. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Zhejiang Publishing Media is 2.25 times less risky than Thinkingdom Media. The stock trades about -0.45 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Thinkingdom Media Group is currently generating about -0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,116  in Thinkingdom Media Group on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (51.00) from holding Thinkingdom Media Group or give up 2.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Zhejiang Publishing Media  vs.  Thinkingdom Media Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Zhejiang Publishing Media 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Zhejiang Publishing Media has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.
Thinkingdom Media 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Thinkingdom Media Group are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Thinkingdom Media sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media

The main advantage of trading using opposite Zhejiang Publishing and Thinkingdom Media positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Zhejiang Publishing position performs unexpectedly, Thinkingdom Media can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Thinkingdom Media will offset losses from the drop in Thinkingdom Media's long position.
The idea behind Zhejiang Publishing Media and Thinkingdom Media Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets