Correlation Between China State and Spring Airlines

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China State and Spring Airlines at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China State and Spring Airlines into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China State Construction and Spring Airlines Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China State and Spring Airlines and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China State with a short position of Spring Airlines. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China State and Spring Airlines.

Diversification Opportunities for China State and Spring Airlines

0.72
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Spring is 0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China State Construction and Spring Airlines Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spring Airlines and China State is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China State Construction are associated (or correlated) with Spring Airlines. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spring Airlines has no effect on the direction of China State i.e., China State and Spring Airlines go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China State and Spring Airlines

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon China State Construction is expected to generate 1.03 times more return on investment than Spring Airlines. However, China State is 1.03 times more volatile than Spring Airlines Co. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Spring Airlines Co is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  520.00  in China State Construction on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  77.00  from holding China State Construction or generate 14.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

China State Construction  vs.  Spring Airlines Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
China State Construction 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China State Construction are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, China State sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Spring Airlines 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Spring Airlines Co are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Spring Airlines sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

China State and Spring Airlines Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with China State and Spring Airlines

The main advantage of trading using opposite China State and Spring Airlines positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China State position performs unexpectedly, Spring Airlines can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spring Airlines will offset losses from the drop in Spring Airlines' long position.
The idea behind China State Construction and Spring Airlines Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance