Correlation Between Postal Savings and ACM Research

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Postal Savings and ACM Research at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Postal Savings and ACM Research into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Postal Savings Bank and ACM Research Shanghai, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Postal Savings and ACM Research and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Postal Savings with a short position of ACM Research. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Postal Savings and ACM Research.

Diversification Opportunities for Postal Savings and ACM Research

0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Postal and ACM is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Postal Savings Bank and ACM Research Shanghai in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ACM Research Shanghai and Postal Savings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Postal Savings Bank are associated (or correlated) with ACM Research. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ACM Research Shanghai has no effect on the direction of Postal Savings i.e., Postal Savings and ACM Research go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Postal Savings and ACM Research

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Postal Savings Bank is expected to generate 0.65 times more return on investment than ACM Research. However, Postal Savings Bank is 1.53 times less risky than ACM Research. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ACM Research Shanghai is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  530.00  in Postal Savings Bank on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  12.00  from holding Postal Savings Bank or generate 2.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Postal Savings Bank  vs.  ACM Research Shanghai

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Postal Savings Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Postal Savings Bank are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Postal Savings sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
ACM Research Shanghai 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in ACM Research Shanghai are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, ACM Research sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Postal Savings and ACM Research Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Postal Savings and ACM Research

The main advantage of trading using opposite Postal Savings and ACM Research positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Postal Savings position performs unexpectedly, ACM Research can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ACM Research will offset losses from the drop in ACM Research's long position.
The idea behind Postal Savings Bank and ACM Research Shanghai pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins