Correlation Between Postal Savings and China Construction

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Postal Savings and China Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Postal Savings and China Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Postal Savings Bank and China Construction Bank, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Postal Savings and China Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Postal Savings with a short position of China Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Postal Savings and China Construction.

Diversification Opportunities for Postal Savings and China Construction

0.9

Correlation Coefficient

Postal Savings  China Construction

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Postal and China is 0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Postal Savings Bank and China Construction Bank in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Construction Bank and Postal Savings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Postal Savings Bank are associated (or correlated) with China Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Construction Bank has no effect on the direction of Postal Savings i.e., Postal Savings and China Construction go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Postal Savings and China Construction

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Postal Savings Bank is expected to generate 1.14 times more return on investment than China Construction. However, Postal Savings is 1.14 times more volatile than China Construction Bank. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Construction Bank is currently generating about 0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  473.00  in Postal Savings Bank on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  58.00  from holding Postal Savings Bank or generate 12.26% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Postal Savings Bank  vs.  China Construction Bank

Postal Savings Bank

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Postal Savings Bank are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Postal Savings sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

China Construction Bank

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Construction Bank are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, China Construction may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Pair Trading with Postal Savings and China Construction

The main advantage of trading using opposite Postal Savings and China Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Postal Savings position performs unexpectedly, China Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Construction will offset losses from the drop in China Construction's long position.

The idea behind Postal Savings Bank and China Construction Bank pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.