Correlation Between CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CSSC Offshore Marine and Zhangjiagang Freetrade Science, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CSSC Offshore with a short position of Zhangjiagang Freetrade. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade.

Diversification Opportunities for CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade

0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between CSSC and Zhangjiagang is 0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CSSC Offshore Marine and Zhangjiagang Freetrade Science in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zhangjiagang Freetrade and CSSC Offshore is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CSSC Offshore Marine are associated (or correlated) with Zhangjiagang Freetrade. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zhangjiagang Freetrade has no effect on the direction of CSSC Offshore i.e., CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon CSSC Offshore is expected to generate 9.57 times less return on investment than Zhangjiagang Freetrade. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, CSSC Offshore Marine is 1.07 times less risky than Zhangjiagang Freetrade. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zhangjiagang Freetrade Science is currently generating about 0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  298.00  in Zhangjiagang Freetrade Science on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  102.00  from holding Zhangjiagang Freetrade Science or generate 34.23% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

CSSC Offshore Marine  vs.  Zhangjiagang Freetrade Science

 Performance 
       Timeline  
CSSC Offshore Marine 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CSSC Offshore Marine are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, CSSC Offshore is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Zhangjiagang Freetrade 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zhangjiagang Freetrade Science are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Zhangjiagang Freetrade sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade

The main advantage of trading using opposite CSSC Offshore and Zhangjiagang Freetrade positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CSSC Offshore position performs unexpectedly, Zhangjiagang Freetrade can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zhangjiagang Freetrade will offset losses from the drop in Zhangjiagang Freetrade's long position.
The idea behind CSSC Offshore Marine and Zhangjiagang Freetrade Science pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets