Correlation Between Time Publishing and China Reform

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Time Publishing and China Reform at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Time Publishing and China Reform into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Time Publishing and and China Reform Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Time Publishing and China Reform and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Time Publishing with a short position of China Reform. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Time Publishing and China Reform.

Diversification Opportunities for Time Publishing and China Reform

0.39

Correlation Coefficient

Time Publishing  China Reform

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Time and China is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Time Publishing and and China Reform Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Reform Health and Time Publishing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Time Publishing and are associated (or correlated) with China Reform. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Reform Health has no effect on the direction of Time Publishing i.e., Time Publishing and China Reform go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Time Publishing and China Reform

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Time Publishing and is expected to under-perform the China Reform. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Time Publishing and is 2.61 times less risky than China Reform. The stock trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The China Reform Health is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,145  in China Reform Health on December 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (33.00) from holding China Reform Health or give up 2.88% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Time Publishing and  vs.  China Reform Health

Time Publishing

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Time Publishing and has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

China Reform Health

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

Over the last 90 days China Reform Health has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, China Reform is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Time Publishing and China Reform

The main advantage of trading using opposite Time Publishing and China Reform positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Time Publishing position performs unexpectedly, China Reform can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Reform will offset losses from the drop in China Reform's long position.

The idea behind Time Publishing and and China Reform Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.