Correlation Between COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in COMPUTER MODELLING with a short position of Graham Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings

-0.29

Correlation Coefficient

COMPUTER MODELLING  Graham Holdings

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between COMPUTER and Graham is -0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Graham Holdings and COMPUTER MODELLING is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on COMPUTER MODELLING are associated (or correlated) with Graham Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Graham Holdings has no effect on the direction of COMPUTER MODELLING i.e., COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon COMPUTER MODELLING is expected to generate 7.81 times less return on investment than Graham Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, COMPUTER MODELLING is 9.62 times less risky than Graham Holdings. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Graham Holdings Co is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  83,831  in Graham Holdings Co on December 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,669  from holding Graham Holdings Co or generate 5.57% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.36%
Values	Daily Returns

COMPUTER MODELLING  vs.  Graham Holdings Co

COMPUTER MODELLING

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in COMPUTER MODELLING are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound forward-looking indicators, COMPUTER MODELLING is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Graham Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Graham Holdings Co are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Graham Holdings may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Pair Trading with COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if COMPUTER MODELLING position performs unexpectedly, Graham Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Graham Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Graham Holdings' long position.

The idea behind COMPUTER MODELLING and Graham Holdings Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.