Correlation Between MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MedFirst Healthcare Services and TECO Electric Machinery, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MedFirst Healthcare with a short position of TECO Electric. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric.

Diversification Opportunities for MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric

-0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between MedFirst and TECO is -0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MedFirst Healthcare Services and TECO Electric Machinery in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on TECO Electric Machinery and MedFirst Healthcare is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MedFirst Healthcare Services are associated (or correlated) with TECO Electric. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of TECO Electric Machinery has no effect on the direction of MedFirst Healthcare i.e., MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon MedFirst Healthcare Services is expected to under-perform the TECO Electric. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, MedFirst Healthcare Services is 1.91 times less risky than TECO Electric. The stock trades about -0.36 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The TECO Electric Machinery is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,220  in TECO Electric Machinery on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (10.00) from holding TECO Electric Machinery or give up 0.19% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

MedFirst Healthcare Services  vs.  TECO Electric Machinery

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MedFirst Healthcare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days MedFirst Healthcare Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the latest fuss on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-term gains for the venture sophisticated investors.
TECO Electric Machinery 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in TECO Electric Machinery are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal basic indicators, TECO Electric may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric

The main advantage of trading using opposite MedFirst Healthcare and TECO Electric positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MedFirst Healthcare position performs unexpectedly, TECO Electric can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in TECO Electric will offset losses from the drop in TECO Electric's long position.
The idea behind MedFirst Healthcare Services and TECO Electric Machinery pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk