Correlation Between Gaming and Rogers Communications

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Gaming and Rogers Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Gaming and Rogers Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Gaming and Leisure and Rogers Communications, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Gaming and Rogers Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Gaming with a short position of Rogers Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Gaming and Rogers Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Gaming and Rogers Communications

-0.14

Correlation Coefficient

Gaming  Rogers Communications

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Gaming and Rogers is -0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gaming and Leisure and Rogers Communications in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Rogers Communications and Gaming is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Gaming and Leisure are associated (or correlated) with Rogers Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Rogers Communications has no effect on the direction of Gaming i.e., Gaming and Rogers Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Gaming and Rogers Communications

Assuming the 90 days horizon Gaming and Leisure is expected to generate 0.97 times more return on investment than Rogers Communications. However, Gaming and Leisure is 1.03 times less risky than Rogers Communications. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Rogers Communications is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,369  in Gaming and Leisure on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  215.00  from holding Gaming and Leisure or generate 4.92% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Gaming and Leisure  vs.  Rogers Communications

Gaming and Leisure

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Gaming and Leisure are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Gaming is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Rogers Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Rogers Communications has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Pair Trading with Gaming and Rogers Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Gaming and Rogers Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Gaming position performs unexpectedly, Rogers Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rogers Communications will offset losses from the drop in Rogers Communications' long position.

The idea behind Gaming and Leisure and Rogers Communications pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.