Correlation Between Gaming and Cogent Communications

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Gaming and Cogent Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Gaming and Cogent Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Gaming and Leisure and Cogent Communications Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Gaming and Cogent Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Gaming with a short position of Cogent Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Gaming and Cogent Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Gaming and Cogent Communications

0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Gaming and Cogent is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gaming and Leisure and Cogent Communications Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cogent Communications and Gaming is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Gaming and Leisure are associated (or correlated) with Cogent Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cogent Communications has no effect on the direction of Gaming i.e., Gaming and Cogent Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Gaming and Cogent Communications

Assuming the 90 days horizon Gaming is expected to generate 5.62 times less return on investment than Cogent Communications. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Gaming and Leisure is 1.61 times less risky than Cogent Communications. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cogent Communications Holdings is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,666  in Cogent Communications Holdings on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  484.00  from holding Cogent Communications Holdings or generate 7.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Gaming and Leisure  vs.  Cogent Communications Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Gaming and Leisure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Gaming and Leisure are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Gaming is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Cogent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cogent Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile primary indicators, Cogent Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Gaming and Cogent Communications Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Gaming and Cogent Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Gaming and Cogent Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Gaming position performs unexpectedly, Cogent Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cogent Communications will offset losses from the drop in Cogent Communications' long position.
The idea behind Gaming and Leisure and Cogent Communications Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins