Correlation Between Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Formosa Plastics Corp and Liton Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Formosa Plastics with a short position of Liton Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology

-0.58
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Formosa and Liton is -0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Formosa Plastics Corp and Liton Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Liton Technology and Formosa Plastics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Formosa Plastics Corp are associated (or correlated) with Liton Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Liton Technology has no effect on the direction of Formosa Plastics i.e., Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Formosa Plastics Corp is expected to under-perform the Liton Technology. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Formosa Plastics Corp is 1.22 times less risky than Liton Technology. The stock trades about -0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Liton Technology is currently generating about -0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4,290  in Liton Technology on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (420.00) from holding Liton Technology or give up 9.79% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Formosa Plastics Corp  vs.  Liton Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Formosa Plastics Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Formosa Plastics Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.
Liton Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Liton Technology are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal basic indicators, Liton Technology may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Formosa Plastics and Liton Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Formosa Plastics position performs unexpectedly, Liton Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Liton Technology will offset losses from the drop in Liton Technology's long position.
The idea behind Formosa Plastics Corp and Liton Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets