Correlation Between PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PennantPark Investment with a short position of Sterling Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction.
Diversification Opportunities for PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction
0.73 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between PennantPark and Sterling is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sterling Construction and PennantPark Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PennantPark Investment are associated (or correlated) with Sterling Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sterling Construction has no effect on the direction of PennantPark Investment i.e., PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction
Assuming the 90 days horizon PennantPark Investment is expected to generate 0.62 times more return on investment than Sterling Construction. However, PennantPark Investment is 1.6 times less risky than Sterling Construction. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sterling Construction is currently generating about -0.25 per unit of risk. If you would invest 637.00 in PennantPark Investment on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 26.00 from holding PennantPark Investment or generate 4.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
PennantPark Investment vs. Sterling Construction
Performance |
Timeline |
PennantPark Investment |
Sterling Construction |
PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction
The main advantage of trading using opposite PennantPark Investment and Sterling Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PennantPark Investment position performs unexpectedly, Sterling Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sterling Construction will offset losses from the drop in Sterling Construction's long position.PennantPark Investment vs. Ameriprise Financial | PennantPark Investment vs. Ares Management Corp | PennantPark Investment vs. NMI Holdings | PennantPark Investment vs. SIVERS SEMICONDUCTORS AB |
Sterling Construction vs. Vinci S A | Sterling Construction vs. Johnson Controls International | Sterling Construction vs. China Railway Group | Sterling Construction vs. China Communications Construction |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |