Correlation Between Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation PLC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Booking Holdings with a short position of Rockwood Realisation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation.

Diversification Opportunities for Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation

-0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Booking and Rockwood is -0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation PLC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Rockwood Realisation PLC and Booking Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Booking Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Rockwood Realisation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Rockwood Realisation PLC has no effect on the direction of Booking Holdings i.e., Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Booking Holdings is expected to generate 14.36 times more return on investment than Rockwood Realisation. However, Booking Holdings is 14.36 times more volatile than Rockwood Realisation PLC. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Rockwood Realisation PLC is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  399,229  in Booking Holdings on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  116,655  from holding Booking Holdings or generate 29.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy97.67%
ValuesDaily Returns

Booking Holdings  vs.  Rockwood Realisation PLC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Booking Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Booking Holdings are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Booking Holdings unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Rockwood Realisation PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Rockwood Realisation PLC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Rockwood Realisation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Booking Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Rockwood Realisation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rockwood Realisation will offset losses from the drop in Rockwood Realisation's long position.
The idea behind Booking Holdings and Rockwood Realisation PLC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing