Correlation Between Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bell Food Group and Concurrent Technologies Plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bell Food with a short position of Concurrent Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies

-0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bell and Concurrent is -0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bell Food Group and Concurrent Technologies Plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Concurrent Technologies and Bell Food is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bell Food Group are associated (or correlated) with Concurrent Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Concurrent Technologies has no effect on the direction of Bell Food i.e., Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bell Food is expected to generate 7.86 times less return on investment than Concurrent Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bell Food Group is 2.05 times less risky than Concurrent Technologies. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Concurrent Technologies Plc is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  7,577  in Concurrent Technologies Plc on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,473  from holding Concurrent Technologies Plc or generate 125.02% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.6%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bell Food Group  vs.  Concurrent Technologies Plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bell Food Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bell Food Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Bell Food is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Concurrent Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Concurrent Technologies Plc are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Concurrent Technologies exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bell Food and Concurrent Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bell Food position performs unexpectedly, Concurrent Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Concurrent Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Concurrent Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Bell Food Group and Concurrent Technologies Plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance