Correlation Between Julius Baer and LO Funds
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Julius Baer Edelweiss and LO Funds Swiss, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Julius Baer and LO Funds and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Julius Baer with a short position of LO Funds. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Julius Baer and LO Funds.
Diversification Opportunities for Julius Baer and LO Funds
0.95 | Correlation Coefficient |
Almost no diversification
The 3 months correlation between Julius and 0P00001R8Q is 0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Julius Baer Edelweiss and LO Funds Swiss in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on LO Funds Swiss and Julius Baer is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Julius Baer Edelweiss are associated (or correlated) with LO Funds. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of LO Funds Swiss has no effect on the direction of Julius Baer i.e., Julius Baer and LO Funds go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Julius Baer and LO Funds
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Julius Baer Edelweiss is expected to under-perform the LO Funds. But the fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Julius Baer Edelweiss is 1.18 times less risky than LO Funds. The fund trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The LO Funds Swiss is currently generating about -0.18 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 20,821 in LO Funds Swiss on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (457.00) from holding LO Funds Swiss or give up 2.19% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Julius Baer Edelweiss vs. LO Funds Swiss
Performance |
Timeline |
Julius Baer Edelweiss |
LO Funds Swiss |
Julius Baer and LO Funds Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Julius Baer and LO Funds
The main advantage of trading using opposite Julius Baer and LO Funds positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Julius Baer position performs unexpectedly, LO Funds can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LO Funds will offset losses from the drop in LO Funds' long position.Julius Baer vs. CSIF III Eq | Julius Baer vs. UBS Property | Julius Baer vs. Procimmo Real Estate | Julius Baer vs. Baloise Holding AG |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Other Complementary Tools
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |