Correlation Between Iron Mountain and BAE Systems

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Iron Mountain and BAE Systems at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Iron Mountain and BAE Systems into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Iron Mountain and BAE Systems plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Iron Mountain and BAE Systems and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Iron Mountain with a short position of BAE Systems. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Iron Mountain and BAE Systems.

Diversification Opportunities for Iron Mountain and BAE Systems

-0.83
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Iron and BAE is -0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Iron Mountain and BAE Systems plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on BAE Systems plc and Iron Mountain is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Iron Mountain are associated (or correlated) with BAE Systems. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of BAE Systems plc has no effect on the direction of Iron Mountain i.e., Iron Mountain and BAE Systems go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Iron Mountain and BAE Systems

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Iron Mountain is expected to under-perform the BAE Systems. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Iron Mountain is 1.22 times less risky than BAE Systems. The stock trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The BAE Systems plc is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  115,600  in BAE Systems plc on December 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  51,700  from holding BAE Systems plc or generate 44.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy98.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

Iron Mountain  vs.  BAE Systems plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Iron Mountain 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Iron Mountain has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
BAE Systems plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in BAE Systems plc are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, BAE Systems exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Iron Mountain and BAE Systems Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Iron Mountain and BAE Systems

The main advantage of trading using opposite Iron Mountain and BAE Systems positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Iron Mountain position performs unexpectedly, BAE Systems can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in BAE Systems will offset losses from the drop in BAE Systems' long position.
The idea behind Iron Mountain and BAE Systems plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.