Correlation Between GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GS Engineering Construction and Cube Entertainment, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GS Engineering with a short position of Cube Entertainment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment.

Diversification Opportunities for GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment

0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between 006360 and Cube is 0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GS Engineering Construction and Cube Entertainment in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cube Entertainment and GS Engineering is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GS Engineering Construction are associated (or correlated) with Cube Entertainment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cube Entertainment has no effect on the direction of GS Engineering i.e., GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon GS Engineering is expected to generate 6.57 times less return on investment than Cube Entertainment. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, GS Engineering Construction is 1.47 times less risky than Cube Entertainment. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cube Entertainment is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,294,000  in Cube Entertainment on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  208,000  from holding Cube Entertainment or generate 16.07% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

GS Engineering Construction  vs.  Cube Entertainment

 Performance 
       Timeline  
GS Engineering Const 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in GS Engineering Construction are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, GS Engineering is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Cube Entertainment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cube Entertainment are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Cube Entertainment sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment

The main advantage of trading using opposite GS Engineering and Cube Entertainment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GS Engineering position performs unexpectedly, Cube Entertainment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cube Entertainment will offset losses from the drop in Cube Entertainment's long position.
The idea behind GS Engineering Construction and Cube Entertainment pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance