Correlation Between GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GS Engineering Construction and Ssangyong Information Communication, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GS Engineering with a short position of Ssangyong Information. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information.

Diversification Opportunities for GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information

0.46
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between 006360 and Ssangyong is 0.46. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GS Engineering Construction and Ssangyong Information Communic in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ssangyong Information and GS Engineering is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GS Engineering Construction are associated (or correlated) with Ssangyong Information. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ssangyong Information has no effect on the direction of GS Engineering i.e., GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon GS Engineering Construction is expected to under-perform the Ssangyong Information. In addition to that, GS Engineering is 1.3 times more volatile than Ssangyong Information Communication. It trades about -0.15 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Ssangyong Information Communication is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  62,400  in Ssangyong Information Communication on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  800.00  from holding Ssangyong Information Communication or generate 1.28% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

GS Engineering Construction  vs.  Ssangyong Information Communic

 Performance 
       Timeline  
GS Engineering Const 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days GS Engineering Construction has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, GS Engineering is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Ssangyong Information 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ssangyong Information Communication are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Ssangyong Information is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information

The main advantage of trading using opposite GS Engineering and Ssangyong Information positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GS Engineering position performs unexpectedly, Ssangyong Information can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ssangyong Information will offset losses from the drop in Ssangyong Information's long position.
The idea behind GS Engineering Construction and Ssangyong Information Communication pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity