Correlation Between Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Shenzhen Coship Electronics and Xiangyang Automobile Bearing, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Shenzhen Coship with a short position of Xiangyang Automobile. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile.

Diversification Opportunities for Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile

-0.16
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Shenzhen and Xiangyang is -0.16. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Shenzhen Coship Electronics and Xiangyang Automobile Bearing in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Xiangyang Automobile and Shenzhen Coship is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Shenzhen Coship Electronics are associated (or correlated) with Xiangyang Automobile. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Xiangyang Automobile has no effect on the direction of Shenzhen Coship i.e., Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Shenzhen Coship is expected to generate 22.3 times less return on investment than Xiangyang Automobile. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Shenzhen Coship Electronics is 1.4 times less risky than Xiangyang Automobile. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Xiangyang Automobile Bearing is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  696.00  in Xiangyang Automobile Bearing on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  548.00  from holding Xiangyang Automobile Bearing or generate 78.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Shenzhen Coship Electronics  vs.  Xiangyang Automobile Bearing

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Shenzhen Coship Elec 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Shenzhen Coship Electronics are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Shenzhen Coship is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Xiangyang Automobile 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Xiangyang Automobile Bearing are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Xiangyang Automobile sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile

The main advantage of trading using opposite Shenzhen Coship and Xiangyang Automobile positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Shenzhen Coship position performs unexpectedly, Xiangyang Automobile can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Xiangyang Automobile will offset losses from the drop in Xiangyang Automobile's long position.
The idea behind Shenzhen Coship Electronics and Xiangyang Automobile Bearing pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm