Correlation Between Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Telling Telecommunication Holding and Shenzhen Coship Electronics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Telling Telecommunicatio with a short position of Shenzhen Coship. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship.

Diversification Opportunities for Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship

0.04
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Telling and Shenzhen is 0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Telling Telecommunication Hold and Shenzhen Coship Electronics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Shenzhen Coship Elec and Telling Telecommunicatio is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Telling Telecommunication Holding are associated (or correlated) with Shenzhen Coship. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Shenzhen Coship Elec has no effect on the direction of Telling Telecommunicatio i.e., Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Telling Telecommunicatio is expected to generate 4.08 times less return on investment than Shenzhen Coship. In addition to that, Telling Telecommunicatio is 1.06 times more volatile than Shenzhen Coship Electronics. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Shenzhen Coship Electronics is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  204.00  in Shenzhen Coship Electronics on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  441.00  from holding Shenzhen Coship Electronics or generate 216.18% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.58%
ValuesDaily Returns

Telling Telecommunication Hold  vs.  Shenzhen Coship Electronics

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Telling Telecommunicatio 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Telling Telecommunication Holding are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Telling Telecommunicatio sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Shenzhen Coship Elec 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

31 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Shenzhen Coship Electronics are ranked lower than 31 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Shenzhen Coship sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship

The main advantage of trading using opposite Telling Telecommunicatio and Shenzhen Coship positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Telling Telecommunicatio position performs unexpectedly, Shenzhen Coship can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Shenzhen Coship will offset losses from the drop in Shenzhen Coship's long position.
The idea behind Telling Telecommunication Holding and Shenzhen Coship Electronics pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk