Correlation Between Financial Street and Harvest Fund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Financial Street and Harvest Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Financial Street and Harvest Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Financial Street Holdings and Harvest Fund Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Financial Street and Harvest Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Financial Street with a short position of Harvest Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Financial Street and Harvest Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Financial Street and Harvest Fund

-0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Financial and Harvest is -0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Financial Street Holdings and Harvest Fund Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Harvest Fund Management and Financial Street is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Financial Street Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Harvest Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Harvest Fund Management has no effect on the direction of Financial Street i.e., Financial Street and Harvest Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Financial Street and Harvest Fund

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Financial Street Holdings is expected to under-perform the Harvest Fund. In addition to that, Financial Street is 1.06 times more volatile than Harvest Fund Management. It trades about -0.21 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Harvest Fund Management is currently generating about 0.49 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  273.00  in Harvest Fund Management on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  56.00  from holding Harvest Fund Management or generate 20.51% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Financial Street Holdings  vs.  Harvest Fund Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Financial Street Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Financial Street Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Financial Street is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Harvest Fund Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

26 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Harvest Fund Management are ranked lower than 26 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Harvest Fund sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Financial Street and Harvest Fund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Financial Street and Harvest Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Financial Street and Harvest Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Financial Street position performs unexpectedly, Harvest Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Harvest Fund will offset losses from the drop in Harvest Fund's long position.
The idea behind Financial Street Holdings and Harvest Fund Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume