Andrew Card - Union Pacific Independent Director
| UNP Stock | USD 234.79 1.60 0.68% |
Director
Mr. Andrew H. Card, Jr. is Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Card most recently served as the President of Franklin Pierce University from January 12, 2015 until August 1, 2016. Mr. Card previously served as the Executive Director of the Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs at Texas AM University from August 2013 to December 2014. From July 2011 to August 2013, Mr. Card served as acting dean of The Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas AM University. Mr. Card served as Chief of Staff to President George W. Bush from November 2000 to April 2006. Prior to joining the White House, Mr. Card served as Vice PresidentGovernment Relations for General Motors Corporationrationration, one of the worlds largest auto makers. From 1993 to 1998, Mr. Card was President and Chief Executive Officer of the American Automobile Manufacturers Association. Mr. Card served as the 11th Secretary of Transportation under President George H.W. Bush from 1992 to 1993. He also served as a Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Intergovernmental Affairs for President Ronald Reagan. Mr. Card served on the board of Lorillard, Inc. from August 2011 to 2015. since 2006.
| Age | 73 |
| Tenure | 19 years |
| Address | 1400 Douglas Street, Omaha, NE, United States, 68179 |
| Phone | 402 544 5000 |
| Web | https://www.up.com |
Union Pacific Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0906 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0906 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.426 %, implying that it generated $0.426 on every 100 dollars invested. Union Pacific's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Union Pacific manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 03/20/2025, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.11. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.16. As of 03/20/2025, Change To Liabilities is likely to grow to about 352.6 M, while Total Current Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 3.4 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| John Thompson | Norfolk Southern | 69 | |
| Eva Boratto | United Parcel Service | 54 | |
| William Ayer | Honeywell International | 65 | |
| Grace Lieblein | Honeywell International | 59 | |
| George Paz | Honeywell International | 64 | |
| Donald Carty | Canadian National Railway | 73 | |
| Michael Burns | United Parcel Service | 69 | |
| Jennifer Scanlon | Norfolk Southern | 54 | |
| John Huffard | Norfolk Southern | 53 | |
| Wayne Hewett | United Parcel Service | 56 | |
| Shauneen Bruder | Canadian National Railway | 60 | |
| Michael Lockhart | Norfolk Southern | 72 | |
| Clive Hollick | Honeywell International | 75 | |
| Angela Hwang | United Parcel Service | 55 | |
| Christiana Shi | United Parcel Service | 61 | |
| Kevin Warsh | United Parcel Service | 50 | |
| Gordon Giffin | Canadian National Railway | 70 | |
| Thomas Bell | Norfolk Southern | 71 | |
| James OConnor | Canadian National Railway | 70 | |
| Rudolph Markham | United Parcel Service | 74 | |
| Robert Phillips | Canadian National Railway | 69 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.43 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0906 |
Union Pacific Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Union Pacific's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Union Pacific inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Union. The board's role is to monitor Union Pacific's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Union Pacific's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Union Pacific's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Kenyatta Rocker, Executive Vice President – Marketing and Sales of the Railroad | ||
| Craig Richardson, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Bryan Clark, Vice President - Tax | ||
| Todd Rynaski, Vice President, Controller of the Union Pacific Corporation and the Railroad | ||
| Clarissa Beyah, Chief Communications Officer | ||
| Teresa Finley, Independent Director | ||
| Andrew Card, Independent Director | ||
| Sheri Edison, Independent Director | ||
| Deborah Hopkins, Independent Director | ||
| Lance Fritz, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer of Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company | ||
| Erroll Davis, Independent Director | ||
| Brian Barr, Senior Transportation | ||
| Gary Grosz, Vice President Treasurer | ||
| David Dillon, Independent Director | ||
| Jose Villarreal, Independent Director | ||
| Michael McCarthy, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Clark Ponthier, Senior Vice President - Supply Chain and Continuous Improvement of the Railroad | ||
| Rahul Jalali, Senior Vice President - Information Technologies, Chief Information Officer | ||
| Josh Perkes, Vice President - Loup Logistics | ||
| Jennifer Hamann, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Union Pacific Corporation and the Railroad | ||
| Jon Panzer, Senior Vice President - Technology and Strategic Planning | ||
| Bhavesh Patel, Independent Director | ||
| Thomas Mclarty, Independent Director | ||
| Scott Moore, Senior Vice President - Corporate Relations and Chief Administrative Officer | ||
| Jason Hess, Vice President - Premium, Marketing and Sales | ||
| V Vena, Chief Operating Officer of Union Pacific Corporation and the Railroad | ||
| Clarissa BeyahTaylor, Chief Officer | ||
| Jane Lute, Independent Director | ||
| Thomas Lischer, Executive Vice President – Operations of the Railroad | ||
| Prentiss Bolin, Vice President - External Relations | ||
| Brad Stock, Assistant Relations | ||
| William DeLaney, Independent Director | ||
| Vincenzo Vena, Senior Advisor | ||
| Christopher Williams, Independent Director | ||
| Michael Miller, Vice President Treasurer | ||
| Rhonda Ferguson, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Secretary of Union Pacific Corporation and the Railroad | ||
| Kari Kirchhoefer, Vice President - Loup Logistic | ||
| Eric Gehringer, Executive Vice President - Operations of the Railroad | ||
| Joshua Perkes, Senior Officer | ||
| Brad Thrasher, Vice President - Bulk | ||
| Elizabeth Whited, Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President of Union Pacific Corporation and the Railroad |
Union Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Union Pacific a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.43 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0906 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.28 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.41 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 174.7 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 604.29 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.23 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 82.32 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 7.66 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 19.05 X |
Pair Trading with Union Pacific
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Union Pacific position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Union Pacific will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Union Stock
| 0.82 | CP | Canadian Pacific Railway | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | FLYX | flyExclusive, | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | CPA | Copa Holdings SA | PairCorr |
Moving against Union Stock
| 0.58 | CVLG | Covenant Logistics Group, | PairCorr |
| 0.51 | ULH | Universal Logistics | PairCorr |
| 0.45 | JBLU | JetBlue Airways Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.38 | TFII | TFI International | PairCorr |
| 0.35 | MRTN | Marten Transport | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Union Pacific could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Union Pacific when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Union Pacific - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Union Pacific to buy it.
The correlation of Union Pacific is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Union Pacific moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Union Pacific moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Union Pacific can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Union Stock Analysis
When running Union Pacific's price analysis, check to measure Union Pacific's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Union Pacific is operating at the current time. Most of Union Pacific's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Union Pacific's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Union Pacific's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Union Pacific to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.