Anne DelSanto - Juniper Networks Independent Director
| JNPR Stock | USD 36.04 0.05 0.14% |
Director
Ms. Anne T. DelSanto is an independent Director of the Company. He currently serves as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Platform at Salesforce.com, Inc., a customer relationship management company, a position she has held since February 2018. Prior to her current role, she served in various executivelevel roles at Salesforce since October 2012, including as the Executive Vice President, Americas Solution Engineering Cloud Sales from February 2016 to February 2018 Executive Vice President, Global Solution Engineering and Cloud Specialist Sales from February 2015 to February 2016 and Senior Vice President, Global Solutions Engineering from October 2012 to February 2015. Prior to joining Salesforce, Ms. DelSanto also served in various roles of increasing responsibility in presales from 1999 to 2012 at Oracle Corporation, an information technology and services company, including most recently as Group Vice President, Sales Engineering from February 2012 to September 2012 and Vice President of Sales Engineering from 2007 to February 2012. She began her career in 1985 as an account systems engineer at IBM, an information technology and services company. since 2019.
| Age | 57 |
| Tenure | 6 years |
| Address | 1133 Innovation Way, Sunnyvale, CA, United States, 94089 |
| Phone | 408 745 2000 |
| Web | https://www.juniper.net |
Juniper Networks Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0233 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0233 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.0621 %, meaning that it created $0.0621 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Juniper Networks' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Juniper Networks manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 02/27/2025, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.05. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.04. At this time, Juniper Networks' Non Currrent Assets Other are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 02/27/2025, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.05, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 5 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Joanne Olsen | Ciena Corp | 62 | |
| Cheryl Shavers | Knowles Cor | 67 | |
| Stephen Boshold | Zebra Technologies | N/A | |
| Ye Li | Knowles Cor | 53 | |
| Greg Mondre | Motorola Solutions | 42 | |
| Judith OBrien | Ciena Corp | 70 | |
| LipBu Tan | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 60 | |
| Clayton Jones | Motorola Solutions | 70 | |
| Jeanette Horan | Nokia Corp ADR | 66 | |
| Daniel Ammann | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 48 | |
| Marcus Kupferschmidt | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | N/A | |
| Bruce Claflin | Ciena Corp | 69 | |
| Edward Kozel | Nokia Corp ADR | 65 | |
| Patrick Gallagher | Ciena Corp | 66 | |
| Pete Hall | Ciena Corp | N/A | |
| Raymond Lane | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 74 | |
| Thomas Dannenfeldt | Nokia Corp ADR | 54 | |
| Egon Durban | Motorola Solutions | 47 | |
| Mary Wilderotter | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 64 | |
| Bruce Brown | Nokia Corp ADR | 63 | |
| Joseph Tucci | Motorola Solutions | 73 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0621 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0233 |
Juniper Networks Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Juniper Networks' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Juniper Networks inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Juniper. The board's role is to monitor Juniper Networks' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Juniper Networks' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Juniper Networks' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Janet Haugen, Independent Director | ||
| William Stensrud, Independent Director | ||
| Michael Marcellin, Chief VP | ||
| Scott Kriens, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Thomas Austin, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President Corporate Controller | ||
| Sharon Mandell, Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer | ||
| Christopher Kaddaras, Executive Officer | ||
| Kevin Hutchins, Senior Vice President - Strategy and Product Line Management | ||
| Anne DelSanto, Independent Director | ||
| Rahul Merchant, Independent Director | ||
| Marcus Jewell, Senior Vice President General Manager - Europe, Middle East and Africa | ||
| Pradeep Sindhu, Co-Founder, Vice Chairman and Chief Technical Officer | ||
| Jess Lubert, Vice Relations | ||
| James Dolce, Independent Director | ||
| Christine Gorjanc, Independent Director | ||
| Robert Mobassaly, Senior Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | ||
| Rami Rahim, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Kenneth Miller, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Jean English, Senior Officer | ||
| Raj Yavatkar, Senior CTO | ||
| Manoj Leelanivas, Executive Vice President and Chief Product Officer | ||
| Brian Martin, Senior Vice President General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Gary Daichendt, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Kevin DeNuccio, Independent Director | ||
| Anand Athreya, Executive Vice President Chief Development Officer |
Juniper Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Juniper Networks a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0621 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0233 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.06 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.13 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 12.36 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 333.19 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.30 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 84.36 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 9.76 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 51.90 X |
Pair Trading with Juniper Networks
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Juniper Networks position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Juniper Networks will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Juniper Stock
| 0.7 | JNJ | Johnson Johnson | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | PG | Procter Gamble | PairCorr |
| 0.61 | BRK-A | Berkshire Hathaway | PairCorr |
| 0.61 | BRK-B | Berkshire Hathaway | PairCorr |
| 0.53 | IBM | International Business | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Juniper Networks could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Juniper Networks when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Juniper Networks - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Juniper Networks to buy it.
The correlation of Juniper Networks is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Juniper Networks moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Juniper Networks moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Juniper Networks can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Juniper Stock Analysis
When running Juniper Networks' price analysis, check to measure Juniper Networks' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Juniper Networks is operating at the current time. Most of Juniper Networks' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Juniper Networks' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Juniper Networks' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Juniper Networks to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.