Dee Nazarenus - Energy Fuels Vice President of Human Resources & Administration
| EFR Stock | CAD 8.30 0.21 2.47% |
Insider
Dee Nazarenus is Vice President of Human Resources & Administration of Energy Fuels since 2020.
| Age | 66 |
| Tenure | 4 years |
| Address | 225 Union Boulevard, Lakewood, CO, United States, 80228 |
| Phone | 303 974 2140 |
| Web | https://www.energyfuels.com |
Dee Nazarenus Latest Insider Activity
Tracking and analyzing the buying and selling activities of Dee Nazarenus against Energy Fuels stock is an integral part of due diligence when investing in Energy Fuels. Dee Nazarenus insider activity provides valuable insight into whether Energy Fuels is net buyers or sellers over its current business cycle. Note, Energy Fuels insiders must abide by specific rules, including filing SEC forms every time they buy or sell Energy Fuels'shares to prevent insider trading or benefiting illegally from material non-public information that their positions give them access to.
Dee Nazarenus over a year ago Exercise or conversion by Dee Nazarenus of 4479 shares of Energy Fuels subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Dee Nazarenus over a year ago Exercise or conversion by Dee Nazarenus of 8958 shares of Energy Fuels subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Dee Nazarenus over a year ago Exercise or conversion by Dee Nazarenus of 3850 shares of Energy Fuels subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Energy Fuels Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0445) % which means that it has lost $0.0445 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of (0.092) %, meaning that it generated substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Energy Fuels' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Energy Fuels manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Energy Fuels' Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 16th of December 2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.26, though Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to (0.08). At this time, Energy Fuels' Return On Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 16th of December 2024, Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 0.18, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop about 84.7 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| David Moore | Sangoma Technologies Corp | N/A | |
| Cameron Brown | Western Copper and | N/A | |
| Cameron PEng | Western Copper and | N/A | |
| D McDonnell | Quorum Information Technologies | 51 | |
| Jonathan Pannaman | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Robert Peter | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Frederic Dickey | Sangoma Technologies Corp | N/A | |
| CA BMgt | Quorum Information Technologies | N/A | |
| Vince Silvestri | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Robert Proia | Quorum Information Technologies | N/A | |
| F Corman | Western Copper and | N/A | |
| BCom CGA | Quorum Information Technologies | N/A | |
| Lana Murphy | Quorum Information Technologies | N/A | |
| Daniel Turow | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Greg Pollard | Quorum Information Technologies | N/A | |
| Michael McGarvey | Quorum Information Technologies | N/A | |
| Antoniella Assalone | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Orest Holyk | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Jeff Marks | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Nenad Corbic | Sangoma Technologies Corp | N/A | |
| Scott Maroni | Quorum Information Technologies | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.092 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0445 |
Energy Fuels Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Energy Fuels' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Energy Fuels inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Energy. The board's role is to monitor Energy Fuels' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Energy Fuels' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Energy Fuels' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Nathan Bennett, Chief Officer | ||
| Alexander Morrison, Independent Director | ||
| Benjamin Eshleman, Independent Director | ||
| Robert Kirkwood, Independent Director | ||
| John Uhrie, Chief Officer | ||
| Bruce Hansen, Independent Director | ||
| Dennis Higgs, Independent Director | ||
| BCom ACA, Executive Operations | ||
| Philip Buck, Vice Inc | ||
| W Goranson, Chief Operating Officer | ||
| CPA BBus, Chief Officer | ||
| Bernard Bonifas, Director Corporation | ||
| Daniel Kapostasy, Director Services | ||
| Matthew Tarnowski, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| MBA JD, Senior Development | ||
| Mark Chalmers, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Dee Nazarenus, Vice President of Human Resources & Administration | ||
| David Frydenlund, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Curtis Moore, Vice President of Marketing and Corporate Development | ||
| J Bovaird, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Sarai Luksch, Corporate Controller | ||
| Thomas Brock, Chief Officer | ||
| Scott Bakken, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs | ||
| BSc PE, CEO Pres | ||
| Barbara Filas, Independent Director |
Energy Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Energy Fuels a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.092 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0445 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.90) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (2.58) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.46 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 196.6 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 2.00 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 54.40 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.62 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | (3.35) X |
Pair Trading with Energy Fuels
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Energy Fuels position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energy Fuels will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Energy Stock
Moving against Energy Stock
| 0.8 | MFC-PC | Manulife Finl Srs | PairCorr |
| 0.67 | SLF-PC | Sun Life Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.66 | SLF-PD | Sun Life Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.58 | SAGE | Sage Potash Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.45 | SLF-PG | Sun Life Non | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Energy Fuels could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Energy Fuels when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Energy Fuels - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Energy Fuels to buy it.
The correlation of Energy Fuels is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Energy Fuels moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Energy Fuels moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Energy Fuels can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Energy Fuels. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. To learn how to invest in Energy Stock, please use our How to Invest in Energy Fuels guide.You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.