Levi Strauss Debt
| LV2B Stock | EUR 15.95 0.18 1.12% |
Levi Strauss holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.253. . Levi Strauss' financial risk is the risk to Levi Strauss stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.
Asset vs Debt
Equity vs Debt
Levi Strauss' liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Levi Strauss' cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Levi Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Levi Strauss' stakeholders.
For most companies, including Levi Strauss, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Levi Strauss Co, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Levi Strauss' management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Given that Levi Strauss' debt-to-equity ratio measures a Company's obligations relative to the value of its net assets, it is usually used by traders to estimate the extent to which Levi Strauss is acquiring new debt as a mechanism of leveraging its assets. A high debt-to-equity ratio is generally associated with increased risk, implying that it has been aggressive in financing its growth with debt. Another way to look at debt-to-equity ratios is to compare the overall debt load of Levi Strauss to its assets or equity, showing how much of the company assets belong to shareholders vs. creditors. If shareholders own more assets, Levi Strauss is said to be less leveraged. If creditors hold a majority of Levi Strauss' assets, the Company is said to be highly leveraged.
Levi |
Levi Strauss Debt to Cash Allocation
Many companies such as Levi Strauss, eventually find out that there is only so much market out there to be conquered, and adding the next product or service is only half as profitable per unit as their current endeavors. Eventually, the company will reach a point where cash flows are strong, and extra cash is available but not fully utilized. In this case, the company may start buying back its stock from the public or issue more dividends.
Levi Strauss Co has accumulated 984.5 M in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 2.25, implying the company greatly relies on financing operations through barrowing. Levi Strauss has a current ratio of 1.56, which is within standard range for the sector. Debt can assist Levi Strauss until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Levi Strauss' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Levi Strauss sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Levi to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Levi Strauss' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.Levi Strauss Assets Financed by Debt
Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Levi Strauss' operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Levi Strauss, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.Levi Strauss Corporate Bonds Issued
Most Levi bonds can be classified according to their maturity, which is the date when Levi Strauss Co has to pay back the principal to investors. Maturities can be short-term, medium-term, or long-term (more than ten years). Longer-term bonds usually offer higher interest rates but may entail additional risks.
Understaning Levi Strauss Use of Financial Leverage
Levi Strauss' financial leverage ratio helps determine the effect of debt on the overall profitability of the company. It measures Levi Strauss' total debt position, including all outstanding debt obligations, and compares it with Levi Strauss' equity. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Levi Strauss' owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if Levi Strauss is unable to cover its debt costs.
It designs, markets, and sells jeans, casual and dress pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear, and related accessories for men, women, and children in the Americas, Europe, and Asia. The company was founded in 1853 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California. LEVI STRAUSS operates under Apparel Manufacturing classification in Germany and is traded on Frankfurt Stock Exchange. It employs 14800 people. Please read more on our technical analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
Additional Information and Resources on Investing in Levi Stock
When determining whether Levi Strauss offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Levi Strauss' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Levi Strauss Co Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Levi Strauss Co Stock:Check out the analysis of Levi Strauss Fundamentals Over Time. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
What is Financial Leverage?
Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.Leverage and Capital Costs
The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.Benefits of Financial Leverage
Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:- Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
- It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
- Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.