FAT Brands Debt

FAT Stock  USD 5.33  0.04  0.74%   
FAT Brands has over 1.38 Billion in debt which may indicate that it relies heavily on debt financing. At this time, FAT Brands' Net Debt is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Short and Long Term Debt Total is likely to gain to about 1.5 B in 2024, whereas Short Term Debt is likely to drop slightly above 34.2 M in 2024. . FAT Brands' financial risk is the risk to FAT Brands stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.

Asset vs Debt

Equity vs Debt

FAT Brands' liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. FAT Brands' cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps FAT Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect FAT Brands' stakeholders.

FAT Brands Quarterly Net Debt

1.43 Billion

For most companies, including FAT Brands, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for FAT Brands, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, FAT Brands' management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Price Book
12.8123
Book Value
(24.98)
Operating Margin
(0.06)
Profit Margin
(0.25)
Return On Assets
(0.02)
Given that FAT Brands' debt-to-equity ratio measures a Company's obligations relative to the value of its net assets, it is usually used by traders to estimate the extent to which FAT Brands is acquiring new debt as a mechanism of leveraging its assets. A high debt-to-equity ratio is generally associated with increased risk, implying that it has been aggressive in financing its growth with debt. Another way to look at debt-to-equity ratios is to compare the overall debt load of FAT Brands to its assets or equity, showing how much of the company assets belong to shareholders vs. creditors. If shareholders own more assets, FAT Brands is said to be less leveraged. If creditors hold a majority of FAT Brands' assets, the Company is said to be highly leveraged.
At this time, FAT Brands' Total Current Liabilities is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to gain to about 1.5 B in 2024, whereas Non Current Liabilities Other is likely to drop slightly above 4.4 M in 2024.
  
Check out the analysis of FAT Brands Fundamentals Over Time.
For more information on how to buy FAT Stock please use our How to Invest in FAT Brands guide.

FAT Brands Bond Ratings

FAT Brands financial ratings play a critical role in determining how much FAT Brands have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for FAT Brands' borrowing costs.
Piotroski F Score
4
PoorView
Beneish M Score
(2.01)
Possible ManipulatorView

FAT Brands Debt to Cash Allocation

FAT Brands has 1.38 B in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 7.2, demonstrating that the company may be unable to create cash to meet all of its financial commitments. FAT Brands has a current ratio of 0.4, suggesting that it has not enough short term capital to pay financial commitments when the payables are due. Note however, debt could still be an excellent tool for FAT to invest in growth at high rates of return.

FAT Brands Total Assets Over Time

FAT Brands Assets Financed by Debt

The debt-to-assets ratio shows the degree to which FAT Brands uses debt to finance its assets. It includes both long-term and short-term borrowings maturing within one year. It also includes both tangible and intangible assets, such as goodwill.

FAT Brands Debt Ratio

    
  53.0   
It appears slightly above 47% of FAT Brands' assets are financed be debt. Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the FAT Brands' operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of FAT Brands, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.

FAT Brands Corporate Bonds Issued

FAT Net Debt

Net Debt

1.41 Billion

At this time, FAT Brands' Net Debt is comparatively stable compared to the past year.

Understaning FAT Brands Use of Financial Leverage

FAT Brands' financial leverage ratio measures its total debt position, including all of its outstanding liabilities, and compares it to FAT Brands' current equity. If creditors own a majority of FAT Brands' assets, the company is considered highly leveraged. Understanding the composition and structure of FAT Brands' outstanding bonds gives an idea of how risky it is and if it is worth investing in.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Net Debt1.3 B1.4 B
Short and Long Term Debt Total1.4 B1.5 B
Long Term Debt1.1 B1.2 B
Long Term Debt Total23.6 M19.4 M
Short and Long Term Debt42.6 M26.7 M
Short Term Debt59.9 M34.2 M
Net Debt To EBITDA 23.14  21.99 
Debt To Equity(5.18)(5.44)
Interest Debt Per Share 68.88  72.33 
Debt To Assets 0.75  0.53 
Long Term Debt To Capitalization 1.17  0.90 
Total Debt To Capitalization 1.16  0.90 
Debt Equity Ratio(5.18)(5.44)
Debt Ratio 0.75  0.53 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio(0.04)(0.03)
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Thematic Opportunities

Explore Investment Opportunities

Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
Explore Investing Ideas  

Additional Tools for FAT Stock Analysis

When running FAT Brands' price analysis, check to measure FAT Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy FAT Brands is operating at the current time. Most of FAT Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of FAT Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move FAT Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of FAT Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.