Based on the key indicators related to Designer Brands' liquidity, profitability, solvency, and operating efficiency, Designer Brands is performing exceptionally good at the moment. It has a great risk to report excellent financial results in December. As of now, Designer Brands' Long Term Debt is increasing as compared to previous years. The Designer Brands' current Total Liabilities is estimated to increase to about 1.8 B, while Total Assets are projected to decrease to under 1.2 B. Key indicators impacting Designer Brands' financial strength include:
Investors should never underestimate Designer Brands' ability to pay suppliers on time, ensure interest payments are not accumulating, and correctly time where and how to reinvest extra cash. Individual investors need to monitor Designer Brands' cash flow, debt, and profitability to make informed and accurate decisions about investing in Designer Brands.
Cash And Equivalents
75.84 Million
Designer
Select Account or Indicator
Market Cap
Enterprise Value
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Change To Account Receivables
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
Change To Liabilities
Change To Inventory
Other Cashflows From Investing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Change In Cash
Stock Based Compensation
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Depreciation
Other Non Cash Items
Sale Purchase Of Stock
Investments
Change Receivables
Net Borrowings
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities
Dividends Paid
Cash And Cash Equivalents Changes
Cash Flows Other Operating
Change To Netincome
Change To Operating Activities
Total Assets
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Other Liab
Retained Earnings
Accounts Payable
Cash
Other Assets
Long Term Debt
Inventory
Other Current Assets
Total Liab
Treasury Stock
Intangible Assets
Common Stock
Property Plant Equipment
Short Long Term Debt Total
Net Debt
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Other Stockholder Equity
Good Will
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Non Current Assets Total
Cash And Short Term Investments
Net Receivables
Common Stock Total Equity
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Total Current Assets
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Short Term Debt
Current Deferred Revenue
Non Currrent Assets Other
Short Term Investments
Net Tangible Assets
Total Permanent Equity
Retained Earnings Total Equity
Additional Paid In Capital
Non Current Liabilities Other
Long Term Investments
Deferred Long Term Asset Charges
Long Term Debt Total
Cash And Equivalents
Net Invested Capital
Net Working Capital
Capital Stock
Capital Lease Obligations
Interest Expense
Selling General Administrative
Total Revenue
Gross Profit
Operating Income
Cost Of Revenue
Income Before Tax
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Income Tax Expense
Other Operating Expenses
Ebit
Ebitda
Total Operating Expenses
Depreciation And Amortization
Total Other Income Expense Net
Minority Interest
Discontinued Operations
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Selling And Marketing Expenses
Non Operating Income Net Other
Tax Provision
Interest Income
Net Interest Income
Reconciled Depreciation
Probability Of Bankruptcy
Understanding current and past Designer Brands Financials, including the trends in assets, liabilities, equity and income are directly related to making proper and timely investing decisions. All of Designer Brands' financial statements are interrelated, with each one affecting the others. For example, an increase in Designer Brands' assets may result in an increase in income on the income statement.
Designer Brands competes with Wolverine World, Weyco, Steven Madden, Rocky Brands, and Continental. Designer Brands Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and retails footwear and accessories for women, men, and kids primarily in North America. Designer Brands Inc. was founded in 1991 and is based in Columbus, Ohio. Designer Brands operates under Apparel Retail classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 13500 people.
Specialization
Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Designer Brands's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Designer Brands value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. You can analyze the relationship between different fundamental ratios across Designer Brands competition to find correlations between indicators driving Designer Brands's intrinsic value. More Info.
Designer Brands is rated below average in return on equity category among its peers. It is rated # 5 in return on asset category among its peers . As of now, Designer Brands' Return On Equity is decreasing as compared to previous years. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Designer Brands' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.
Designer Brands Systematic Risk
Designer Brands' systematic risk plays a vital role in portfolio allocation when considering its stock to be added to a well-diversified portfolio. Designer Brands volatility which cannot be eliminated through diversification, requires returns over the risk-free rate. Over the long run, a well-diversified portfolio provides returns that match its exposure to systematic risk. In this case, investors face a trade-off between expected returns and systematic risk and, therefore, can only reduce a portfolio's exposure to systematic risk by sacrificing expected returns on the portfolio.
The output start index for this execution was fourteen with a total number of output elements of fourty-seven. The Beta measures systematic risk based on how returns on Designer Brands correlated with the market. If Beta is less than 0 Designer Brands generally moves in the opposite direction as compared to the market. If Designer Brands Beta is about zero movement of price series is uncorrelated with the movement of the benchmark. if Beta is between zero and one Designer Brands is generally moves in the same direction as, but less than the movement of the market. For Beta = 1 movement of Designer Brands is generally in the same direction as the market. If Beta > 1 Designer Brands moves generally in the same direction as, but more than the movement of the benchmark.
Designer Brands Thematic Clasifications
Designer Brands is part of Retail investing theme. If you are a theme-oriented, socially responsible, and at the same time, a result-driven investor, you can align your investing habits with your values without jeopardizing your expectations about returns. You can easily create an optimal portfolio of stocks, ETFs, funds, or cryptocurrencies based on a specific theme of your liking. USA Equities from Retail industry as classified by Fama & French. Fama and French investing themes focus on testing asset pricing under different economic assumptions
This theme covers USA Equities from Retail industry as classified by Fama & French. Fama and French investing themes focus on testing asset pricing under different economic assumptions. Get More Thematic Ideas
Today, most investors in Designer Brands Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Designer Brands' growth ratios. Consistent increases or decreases in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's growth growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use static breakdown of Designer Brands growth as a starting point in their analysis.
Designer Brands November 28, 2024 Opportunity Range
Along with financial statement analysis, the daily predictive indicators of Designer Brands help investors to analyze its daily demand and supply, volume, patterns, and price swings to determine the real value of Designer Brands. We use our internally-developed statistical techniques to arrive at the intrinsic value of Designer Brands based on widely used predictive technical indicators. In general, we focus on analyzing Designer Stock price patterns and their correlations with different microeconomic environment and drivers. We also apply predictive analytics to build Designer Brands's daily price indicators and compare them against related drivers.
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.