Under Armour Company Insiders

UAA Stock  USD 6.60  0.11  1.64%   
Under Armour employs about 6.8 K people. The company is managed by 36 executives with a total tenure of roughly 190 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 188.89 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Under Armour's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Patrik Frisk  CEO
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Kevin Plank  Chairman
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
  
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Under Armour A. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation.

Under Armour's latest congressional trading

Congressional trading in companies like Under Armour A, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Under Armour by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-01-11Senator Tommy TubervilleAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2023-08-13Senator Tommy TubervilleAcquired Under $15KVerify
2023-07-13Senator Tommy TubervilleAcquired Under $15KVerify
2023-05-01Senator Thomas R CarperAcquired Under $15KVerify
2023-02-14Senator Tommy TubervilleAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2021-11-10Senator Tommy TubervilleAcquired $15K to $50KVerify

Under Armour Management Team Effectiveness

The company has Return on Asset of 0.0305 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0305 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of (0.0612) %, meaning that it generated no profit with money invested by stockholders. Under Armour's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Under Armour manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.

Under Armour Workforce Comparison

Under Armour A is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is at this time estimated at about 199,080. Under Armour holds roughly 6,800 in number of employees claiming about 3% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
The company has Net Profit Margin of (0.02) %, which means that it does not effectively control expenditures or properly executes on its pricing strategies. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.04 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.04 of operating income.

Under Armour Insider Trading

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Under Armour insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Under Armour's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Under Armour insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.

Under Armour Notable Stakeholders

An Under Armour stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Under Armour often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Under Armour's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Under Armour's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Patrik FriskPresident, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
Stephanie LinnartzCEO PresidentProfile
Kevin PlankChairman of the Board, Chief Executive OfficerProfile
Colin BrownePresident - Global SourcingProfile
Massimo BarattoExecutive Vice President, Chief Consumer OfficerProfile
Paul FippsExecutive Vice President - Global Operations, CIOProfile
John StantonExecutive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate SecretaryProfile
David BergmanChief Financial OfficerProfile
Westley MooreIndependent DirectorProfile
Mohamed ElErianLead Independent DirectorProfile
Harvey SandersIndependent DirectorProfile
Alvin KrongardLead Independent DirectorProfile
Eric OlsonIndependent DirectorProfile
Jerri DeVardIndependent DirectorProfile
Douglas ColtharpIndependent DirectorProfile
David GibbsIndependent DirectorProfile
George BodenheimerIndependent DirectorProfile
Karen KatzIndependent DirectorProfile
Frederick IIIChief VPProfile
Aditya MaheshwariController OfficerProfile
Tchernavia RockerChief People and Administrative OfficerProfile
Amanda MillerChief OfficerProfile
Stephanie PugliesePresident North AmericaProfile
Eric AumenChief OfficerProfile
Mohamed ErianLead Independent DirectorProfile
James DauschChief OfficerProfile
Tushar GoculdasManaging OperationsProfile
Lance AllegaSenior DevelopmentProfile
Jason ArcherManaging PacificProfile
Kevin HaleyChief OfficerProfile
Alessandro PestelChief Marketing OfficerProfile
Kasey JarvisChief Design OfficerProfile
Mehri JDChief SecretaryProfile
Danny MilesExecutive OfficerProfile
David CPAChief OfficerProfile
Lisa CollierChief Product OfficerProfile

About Under Armour Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Under Armour A often depends on how effective the management is. Under Armour management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Under management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Under management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Under Armour, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the developing, marketing, and distributing performance apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and youth. Under Armour, Inc. was incorporated in 1996 and is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland. Under Armour operates under Apparel Manufacturing classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 7100 people.
Please note, the presentation of Under Armour's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Under Armour's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Under Armour's management manipulating its earnings.

Under Armour Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Under Armour use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Under Armour within its industry.

Under Armour Manpower Efficiency

Return on Under Armour Manpower

Revenue Per Employee838.5K
Revenue Per Executive158.4M
Net Income Per Employee34.1K
Net Income Per Executive6.4M
Working Capital Per Employee249.7K
Working Capital Per Executive47.2M

Complementary Tools for Under Stock analysis

When running Under Armour's price analysis, check to measure Under Armour's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Under Armour is operating at the current time. Most of Under Armour's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Under Armour's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Under Armour's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Under Armour to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance