Taseko Mines Company Insiders
TGB Stock | USD 2.02 0.06 2.88% |
Taseko Mines employs about 24 people. The company is managed by 24 executives with a total tenure of roughly 182 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Taseko Mines' management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Russell Hallbauer CEO Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Ronald Thiessen Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Taseko |
Taseko Mines Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0337 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0337 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1136 %, implying that it generated $0.1136 on every 100 dollars invested. Taseko Mines' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Taseko Mines manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At present, Taseko Mines' Return On Tangible Assets are projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to 0.14, whereas Return On Equity is forecasted to decline to 0.18. At present, Taseko Mines' Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 1.4 B, whereas Other Current Assets are forecasted to decline to about 7.8 M.The current year's Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to grow to about 305.5 M, whereas Net Loss is projected to grow to (22.2 M).
Taseko Mines Workforce Comparison
Taseko Mines is currently under evaluation in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Materials industry is at this time estimated at about 23,821. Taseko Mines adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of all equities under Materials industry.
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.08 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of (0.07) %, which entails that for every $100 of revenue, it lost $0.07. Taseko Mines Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Taseko Mines Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Taseko Mines price series and its benchmark/peer.
Taseko Mines Notable Stakeholders
A Taseko Mines stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Taseko Mines often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Taseko Mines' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Taseko Mines' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Russell Hallbauer | Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Ronald Thiessen | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Scott Jones | Vice President - Engineering | Profile | |
Stuart McDonald | President | Profile | |
Robert Rotzinger | Vice President - Capital Projects | Profile | |
Brian Bergot | Vice President - Investor Relations | Profile | |
Brian Battison | Vice President - Corporate Affairs | Profile | |
Richard Tremblay | Vice President - Operations | Profile | |
Bryce Hamming | Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
John McManus | Chief Operating Officer | Profile | |
Robert Dickinson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Anu Dhir | Independent Director | Profile | |
Alexander Morrison | Lead Director, Independent Director | Profile | |
Richard Mundie | Independent Director | Profile | |
Kenneth Pickering | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
PEng MBA | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Peter Mitchell | Director | Profile | |
Richard Weymark | Engineering VP | Profile | |
Sean BA | Vice Affairs | Profile | |
BBA CPA | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Terry Morris | Vice Operation | Profile | |
Trevor LLB | Secretary | Profile | |
Trevor Thomas | Secretary | Profile | |
LLB LLB | Sec | Profile |
About Taseko Mines Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Taseko Mines often depends on how effective the management is. Taseko Mines management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Taseko management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Taseko management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.05 | 0.06 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.13 | 0.14 | |
Return On Assets | 0.05 | 0.06 | |
Return On Equity | 0.19 | 0.18 |
Please note, the presentation of Taseko Mines' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Taseko Mines' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Taseko Mines' management manipulating its earnings.
Taseko Mines Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Taseko Mines use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Taseko Mines within its industry.Taseko Mines Manpower Efficiency
Return on Taseko Mines Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 21.9M | |
Revenue Per Executive | 21.9M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 3.4M | |
Net Income Per Executive | 3.4M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 4.5M | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 4.5M |
Complementary Tools for Taseko Stock analysis
When running Taseko Mines' price analysis, check to measure Taseko Mines' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Taseko Mines is operating at the current time. Most of Taseko Mines' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Taseko Mines' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Taseko Mines' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Taseko Mines to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |