Sharp Company Top Insiders
SHCAF Stock | USD 5.85 0.00 0.00% |
Sharp employs about 47.9 K people. The company is managed by 8 executives with a total tenure of roughly 6 years, averaging almost 0.0 years of service per executive, having 5992.63 employees per reported executive. Examination of Sharp's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
HsinShu Chen Insider Sr Group |
Yasufumi Sugahara Insider Ex BU |
Sharp |
Sharp Management Team Effectiveness
Sharp's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Sharp manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Sharp Workforce Comparison
Sharp is rated second in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Electronics industry is at this time estimated at about 397,393. Sharp retains roughly 47,941 in number of employees claiming about 12% of stocks in Consumer Electronics industry.
Sharp Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Sharp Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Sharp price series and its benchmark/peer.
Sharp Notable Stakeholders
A Sharp stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Sharp often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Sharp's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Sharp's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Masahiro Okitsu | Executive Officer, Chief Director of Health and Environment System Business | Profile | |
HsinShu Chen | Sr Group | Profile | |
Yasufumi Sugahara | Ex BU | Profile | |
PoHsuan Wu | Pres Director | Profile | |
Michael Kelly | VP America | Profile | |
Yoshio Kosaka | Exec Group | Profile | |
James Sanduski | Pres America | Profile | |
Tetsuji Kawamura | Exec BU | Profile |
About Sharp Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Sharp often depends on how effective the management is. Sharp management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Sharp management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Sharp management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Sharp Corporation manufactures and sells telecommunication equipment, electric and electronic application equipment, and electronic components in Japan, China, and internationally. Sharp Corporation was founded in 1912 and is headquartered in Sakai, Japan. Sharp Corp operates under Consumer Electronics classification in the United States and is traded on OTC Exchange. It employs 47941 people.
Sharp Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Sharp use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Sharp within its industry.Sharp Manpower Efficiency
Return on Sharp Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 52.1M | |
Revenue Per Executive | 311.9B | |
Net Income Per Employee | 1.5M | |
Net Income Per Executive | 9.2B | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 7.5M | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 44.8B |
Complementary Tools for Sharp Pink Sheet analysis
When running Sharp's price analysis, check to measure Sharp's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Sharp is operating at the current time. Most of Sharp's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Sharp's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Sharp's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Sharp to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments |